Re: [PATCH V2] tty: vcc: Add check for kstrdup() in vcc_probe()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2023/9/5 22:19, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
On Mon, 4 Sep 2023 11:52:20 +0800
Yi Yang <yiyang13@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Add check for the return value of kstrdup() and return the error, if it
fails in order to avoid NULL pointer dereference.

Fixes: 5d171050e28f ("sparc64: vcc: Enable VCC port probe and removal")
Signed-off-by: Yi Yang <yiyang13@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
V2: Add goto target for error paths.
---
  drivers/tty/vcc.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/vcc.c b/drivers/tty/vcc.c
index a39ed981bfd3..5b625f20233b 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/vcc.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/vcc.c
@@ -579,18 +579,22 @@ static int vcc_probe(struct vio_dev *vdev, const struct vio_device_id *id)
  		return -ENOMEM;
name = kstrdup(dev_name(&vdev->dev), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!name) {
+		rv = -ENOMEM;
+		goto free_port;

Hi,
at this point, the port is not yet allocated, so you should not jump to
free_port. You should simply return with -ENOMEM.

The port was already allocated by kzalloc(), and should be free before return -ENOMEM.

+	}
rv = vio_driver_init(&port->vio, vdev, VDEV_CONSOLE_CON, vcc_versions,
  			     ARRAY_SIZE(vcc_versions), NULL, name);
  	if (rv)
-		goto free_port;
+		goto free_name;
port->vio.debug = vcc_dbg_vio;
  	vcc_ldc_cfg.debug = vcc_dbg_ldc;
rv = vio_ldc_alloc(&port->vio, &vcc_ldc_cfg, port);
  	if (rv)
-		goto free_port;
+		goto free_name;

You should still jump to free_port, not free_name, after seeing my
comments below


spin_lock_init(&port->lock); @@ -624,6 +628,11 @@ static int vcc_probe(struct vio_dev *vdev, const struct vio_device_id *id)
  		goto unreg_tty;
  	}
  	port->domain = kstrdup(domain, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!port->domain) {
+		rv = -ENOMEM;
+		goto unreg_tty;
+	}
+
  and should be free before return -ENOMEM.
  	mdesc_release(hp);
@@ -653,8 +662,9 @@ static int vcc_probe(struct vio_dev *vdev, const struct vio_device_id *id)
  	vcc_table_remove(port->index);
  free_ldc:
  	vio_ldc_free(&port->vio);
-free_port:
+free_name:
  	kfree(name);
+free_port:
  	kfree(port);

free_name should come after free_port...

Hugo.
The release process should be in reverse order.

--
Yi Yang


return rv;
--
2.17.1


.




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux