On arm64, NMI support needs to be detected at runtime. Add a weak
function to the perf hardlockup detector so that an architecture can
implement it to detect whether NMIs are available.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
While I won't object to this patch landing, I consider it part of the
arm64 perf hardlockup effort. I would be OK with the earlier patches
in the series landing and then not landing ${SUBJECT} patch nor
anything else later.
I'll also note that, as an alternative to this, it would be nice if we
could figure out how to make perf_event_create_kernel_counter() fail
on arm64 if NMIs aren't available. Maybe we could add a "must_use_nmi"
element to "struct perf_event_attr"?
(no changes since v4)
Changes in v4:
- ("Add a weak function for an arch to detect ...") new for v4.
include/linux/nmi.h | 1 +
kernel/watchdog_perf.c | 12 +++++++++++-
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/nmi.h b/include/linux/nmi.h
index 47db14e7da52..eb616fc07c85 100644
--- a/include/linux/nmi.h
+++ b/include/linux/nmi.h
@@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ static inline bool trigger_single_cpu_backtrace(int cpu)
#ifdef CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PERF
u64 hw_nmi_get_sample_period(int watchdog_thresh);
+bool arch_perf_nmi_is_available(void);
#endif
#if defined(CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_CHECK_TIMESTAMP) && \
diff --git a/kernel/watchdog_perf.c b/kernel/watchdog_perf.c
index 349fcd4d2abc..8ea00c4a24b2 100644
--- a/kernel/watchdog_perf.c
+++ b/kernel/watchdog_perf.c
@@ -234,12 +234,22 @@ void __init hardlockup_detector_perf_restart(void)
}
}
+bool __weak __init arch_perf_nmi_is_available(void)
+{
+ return true;
+}
+
/**
* watchdog_hardlockup_probe - Probe whether NMI event is available at all
*/
int __init watchdog_hardlockup_probe(void)
{
- int ret = hardlockup_detector_event_create();
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!arch_perf_nmi_is_available())
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ ret = hardlockup_detector_event_create();
if (ret) {
pr_info("Perf NMI watchdog permanently disabled\n");
--
2.40.1.698.g37aff9b760-goog
