[PATCH v5 6/7] smp: reword smp call IPI comment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Accessing the call_single_queue hasn't involved a spinlock since 2014:

  6897fc22ea01 ("kernel: use lockless list for smp_call_function_single")

The llist operations (namely cmpxchg() and xchg()) provide similar ordering
guarantees, update the comment to lessen confusion.

Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/smp.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
index 93b4386cd3096..821b5986721ac 100644
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -495,9 +495,10 @@ void __smp_call_single_queue(int cpu, struct llist_node *node)
 #endif
 
 	/*
-	 * The list addition should be visible before sending the IPI
-	 * handler locks the list to pull the entry off it because of
-	 * normal cache coherency rules implied by spinlocks.
+	 * The list addition should be visible to the target CPU when it pops
+	 * the head of the list to pull the entry off it in the IPI handler
+	 * because of normal cache coherency rules implied by the underlying
+	 * llist ops.
 	 *
 	 * If IPIs can go out of order to the cache coherency protocol
 	 * in an architecture, sufficient synchronisation should be added
-- 
2.31.1




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux