On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 4:27 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> arch_cpu_idle() is a very simple idle interface and exposes only a
> single idle state and is expected to not require RCU and not do any
> tracing/instrumentation.
>
> As such, omap_sram_idle() is not a valid implementation. Replace it
> with the simple (shallow) omap3_do_wfi() call. Leaving the more
> complicated idle states for the cpuidle driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I see similar code in omap2:
omap2_pm_idle()
-> omap2_enter_full_retention()
-> omap2_sram_suspend()
Is that code path safe to use without RCU or does it need a similar change?
Arnd
