Re: [PATCH 01/30] x86/crash,reboot: Avoid re-disabling VMX in all CPUs on crash/restart

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 27/04/2022 19:48, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> In the panic path we have a list of functions to be called, the panic
> notifiers - such callbacks perform various actions in the machine's
> last breath, and sometimes users want them to run before kdump. We
> have the parameter "crash_kexec_post_notifiers" for that. When such
> parameter is used, the function "crash_smp_send_stop()" is executed
> to poweroff all secondary CPUs through the NMI-shootdown mechanism;
> part of this process involves disabling virtualization features in
> all CPUs (except the main one).
> 
> Now, in the emergency restart procedure we have also a way of
> disabling VMX in all CPUs, using the same NMI-shootdown mechanism;
> what happens though is that in case we already NMI-disabled all CPUs,
> the emergency restart fails due to a second addition of the same items
> in the NMI list, as per the following log output:
> 
> sysrq: Trigger a crash
> Kernel panic - not syncing: sysrq triggered crash
> [...]
> Rebooting in 2 seconds..
> list_add double add: new=<addr1>, prev=<addr2>, next=<addr1>.
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:29!
> invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
> 
> In order to reproduce the problem, users just need to set the kernel
> parameter "crash_kexec_post_notifiers" *without* kdump set in any
> system with the VMX feature present.
> 
> Since there is no benefit in re-disabling VMX in all CPUs in case
> it was already done, this patch prevents that by guarding the restart
> routine against doubly issuing NMIs unnecessarily. Notice we still
> need to disable VMX locally in the emergency restart.
> 
> Fixes: ed72736183c4 ("x86/reboot: Force all cpus to exit VMX root if VMX is supported)
> Fixes: 0ee59413c967 ("x86/panic: replace smp_send_stop() with kdump friendly version in panic path")
> Cc: David P. Reed <dpreed@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h |  1 +
>  arch/x86/kernel/crash.c    |  8 ++++----
>  arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c   | 14 ++++++++++++--
>  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 

Hi Paolo / Sean / Vitaly, sorry for the ping.
But do you think this fix is OK from the VMX point-of-view?

I'd like to send a V2 of this set soon, so any review here is highly
appreciated!

Cheers,


Guilherme




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux