On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 11:17 AM Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The driver core ignores the return value of struct bus_type::remove() > because there is only little that can be done. To simplify the quest to > make this function return void, let struct vio_driver::remove() return > void, too. All users already unconditionally return 0, this commit makes > it obvious that returning an error code is a bad idea and makes it > obvious for future driver authors that returning an error code isn't > intended. > > Note there are two nominally different implementations for a vio bus: > one in arch/sparc/kernel/vio.c and the other in > arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c. I didn't care to check which > driver is using which of these busses (or if even some of them can be > used with both) and simply adapt all drivers and the two bus codes in > one go. Applied over current git kernel, boots on my sparc64 LDOM (sunvdc block driver which uses vio). Linux ttip 5.11.0-10201-gc03c21ba6f4e-dirty #189 SMP Wed Feb 24 13:48:37 MSK 2021 sparc64 GNU/Linux boot logs (and kernel config) on [1] for "5.11.0-10201-gc03c21ba6f4e-dirty". Up to you to add "tested-by". Thanks. 1. https://github.com/mator/sparc64-dmesg PS: going to check with ppc64 later as well on LPAR (uses vio).
