On 1/12/21 4:46 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 3:45 PM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz > <glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Yeah, I have the same impression that's the strong commercial interest pushes >> hobbyist use of the Linux kernel a bit down. A lot of these changes feel like >> they're motivated by corporate decisions. >> >> There has to be a healthy balance between hobbyist and commercial use. I understand >> that from a commercial point of view, it doesn't make much sense to run Linux >> on a 30-year-old computer. But it's a hobbyist project for many people and hacking >> Linux stuff for these old machines has a very entertaining and educational factor. > > This is actually one of the most interesting things written in this discussion. > > I have both revamped and deleted subarchitectures in the ARM tree. We > never deleted anyone's pet project *unless* they were clearly unwilling to > work on it (such as simply testning new patches) and agreed that it will > not go on. Another fun aspect of old hardware is it serves as prior art for patents. The j-core hardware implementation schedule has in part been driven by specific patents expiring, as in "we can't do $FEATURE until $DATE". It's much easier to nip a patent suit in the bud if you can go "here is functionally equivalent hardware from the past, dates the specifications were published, and the specific patents on the technology which have now expired". We're a little overscheduled and not always _prompt_ about it, but for example the reason we couldn't do full 6-wire sd 1.0 in the first j-core SOC release (and had to implement a painfully slow mmc bus instead) is the patents hadn't expired yet. > That said there are a three things that people should really be doing if they > want to keep their pet archs/subarchs around as good community > members, and they are in essence to: > > 1. Test and review/ack patches that others make I'm trying. :) > 2. Migrate existing drivers to newly appeared and > appropriate subsystems (I think there are some hacky heartbeat LED > drivers down in arch/* for example) there is also the feature matrix > core maintainers like and which appears if you type > Documentation/features/list-arch.sh <archname> > would be nice if you work on them if you can support them! > Or at least take a look. For 3 years in the 1990's SuperH was the best-selling processor in the world, and that's left the architecture with a bunch of legacy boards that aren't easily available to us. I regression test a current kernel build under qemu every month or two, and have portable USB-powered boards for the j-core stuff. When I did an sh4 porting contract in 2018 I got that board updated to a current-ish kernel (3 versions back from then-current it hit some intermittent nor flash filesystem corruption that only occurred intermittently under sustained load; had to ship so I backed off one version and never tracked it down). But these days I'm not always on the same continent as my two actual sh4 hardware boards, have never gotten my physical sh2 board to boot, and $DAYJOB is all j-core stuff not sh4. Testing that a basic superh system still builds and boots under qemu and j-core I can commit to doing regularly. Testing specific hardware devices on boards I don't regularly use is a lot harder. > 3. Migrate old systems to use the > contemporary hardware descriptions (such as device tree or ACPI) > because it makes things so much easier to maintain. Some > upfront work, but a great win for everyone. Especially for > subsystem maintainers. We did that one for our SOC. We haven't ported a lot of legacy boards because we can't easily test most of them. > And if your arch uses highmem then please get rid of highmem. I'm > trying to do this a bit right now for ARM let's see how it goes. I don't believe it does? (We haven't got any configs using it, anyway...) > I understand that for some maintainers time is a factor and this list > feels stressful. I'd say relax, but it'd be nice if you have a TODO that > you cross items off of. My todo list runneth over. One of our perpetual todo list items is "collate todo lists"... > Just my €0.01 > Linus Walleij Rob
