Re: [PATCH -next] sparc: use for_each_child_of_node() macro

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: miaoqinglang@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] sparc: use for_each_child_of_node() macro
From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 17:52:30 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20200728022817.87957-1-miaoqinglang@huawei.com>
References: <20200728022817.87957-1-miaoqinglang@huawei.com>

aFrom: Qinglang Miao <miaoqinglang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 10:28:17 +0800

> Use for_each_child_of_node() macro instead of open coding it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qinglang Miao <miaoqinglang@xxxxxxxxxx>

Applied, thank you.

References:
- [PATCH -next] sparc: use for_each_child_of_node() macro
  - From: Qinglang Miao

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 12/17] arch, drivers: replace for_each_membock() with for_each_mem_range()
Next by Date: Re: [sparc64] enabling CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING makes kernel unable to build
Previous by thread: [PATCH -next] sparc: use for_each_child_of_node() macro
Next by thread: [PATCH 20/24] sparc: use asm-generic/mmu_context.h for no-op implementations
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Development] [DCCP] [Linux ARM Development] [Linux] [Photo] [Yosemite Help] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [Linux x86_64] [Linux Hams]

Powered by Linux