Re: sparc vs sparc64: O_NDELAY and O_NONBLOCK mismatch in kernel and in glibc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/29/20 11:40 AM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> On most targets glibc defines O_NDELAY as O_NONBLOCK.
> (...)
>   I think '#define O_NDELAY O_NONBLOCK' would be most
>   consistent.
> 
> What do you think?

Would this, by any chance, also fix some of the glibc testsuite failures
we are seeing on SPARC? [1]

Adrian

> [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=glibc&arch=sparc64&ver=2.30-8&stamp=1589400224&raw=0

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxx
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux