On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 08:05:50PM +1100, Aleksa Sarai wrote: > One other possible alternative (which previous versions of this patch > used) would be to check with path_is_under() if there was a racing > rename or mount (after re-taking the relevant seqlocks). While this does > work, it results in possible O(n*m) behaviour if there are many renames > or mounts occuring *anywhere on the system*. BTW, do you realize that open-by-fhandle (or working nfsd, for that matter) will trigger arseloads of write_seqlock(&rename_lock) simply on d_splice_alias() bringing disconnected subtrees in contact with parent?
