On 11/06/2019 12:11 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > Le 06/11/2019 à 04:22, Anshuman Khandual a écrit : >> >> >> On 10/28/2019 10:59 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >>> + ----------------------- >>> + | arch |status| >>> + ----------------------- >>> + | alpha: | TODO | >>> + | arc: | TODO | >>> + | arm: | TODO | >>> + | arm64: | ok | >>> + | c6x: | TODO | >>> + | csky: | TODO | >>> + | h8300: | TODO | >>> + | hexagon: | TODO | >>> + | ia64: | TODO | >>> + | m68k: | TODO | >>> + | microblaze: | TODO | >>> + | mips: | TODO | >>> + | nds32: | TODO | >>> + | nios2: | TODO | >>> + | openrisc: | TODO | >>> + | parisc: | TODO | >>> + | powerpc: | TODO | >>> + | ppc32: | ok | > > Note that ppc32 is a part of powerpc, not a standalone arch. Right, I understand. But we are yet to hear about how this test came about on powerpc server platforms. Will update 'powerpc' arch listing above once we get some confirmation. May be once this works on all relevant powerpc platforms, we can just merge 'powerpc' and 'ppc32' entries here as just 'powerpc'. > > Maybe something like the following would be more correct: > | powerpc/32: | ok | > | powerpc/64: | TODO | > > Christophe > >>> + | riscv: | TODO | >>> + | s390: | TODO | >>> + | sh: | TODO | >>> + | sparc: | TODO | >>> + | um: | TODO | >>> + | unicore32: | TODO | >>> + | x86: | ok | >>> + | xtensa: | TODO | >>> + ----------------------- >> >> While here, are there some volunteers to test this on any of the >> 'yet to be tested and supported' platforms ? >> >> - Anshuman >> >
