On 2019/9/1 4:02, David Miller wrote: > From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 16:57:04 +0800 > >> Did you mean sparc64 system does not has ACPI, the device's node id will >> not specified by ACPI, so the ACPI is unrelated here? > > Yes, sparc64 never has and never will have ACPI. > > This is also true for several other platforms where you have made this > change. > > The assumption of your entire patch set is that the semantics of the > NUMA node ID are somehow completely defined by ACPI semantics. Which > is not true. Thanks for pointing out. The NUMA node id in sparc64 system is defined by DT semantics? > > . >
