On 13/06/2019, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 18:32:53 +0200 > >> We already provide the LGPL-2.0 text in LICENSES/preferred/LGPL-2.0, >> so there is no need for this additional copy here. >> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Applied. > Shouldn't the SPDX license identifiers in in arch/sparc/lib be adjusted to reflect the original intent of LGPL licensing? - Kjetil Oftedal
