Re: [PATCH] sparc: vio: use put_device() instead of kfree()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Wednesday 25 April 2018 09:14 PM, Shannon Nelson wrote:
On 4/25/2018 7:56 AM, Arvind Yadav wrote:
Never directly free @dev after calling device_register(), even
if it returned an error. Always use put_device() to give up the
reference initialized.

Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/sparc/kernel/vio.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/vio.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/vio.c
index 1a0fa10..32bae68 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/vio.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/vio.c
@@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ static struct vio_dev *vio_create_one(struct mdesc_handle *hp, u64 mp,
      if (err) {
          printk(KERN_ERR "VIO: Could not register device %s, err=%d\n",
                 dev_name(&vdev->dev), err);
-        kfree(vdev);
+        put_device(&vdev->dev);

Hmmm... I can see why the put_device() might be a good idea, but I think we still need the kfree() so as to not leak the memory that was kzalloc'd above for vdev.


There is no need to call kfree() here. Because put_device()
will decrement the last reference and then free the memory
by calling dev->release(It'll call vio_dev_release()).
Internally put_device() -> kobject_put() -> kobject_cleanup()
which is responsible to call 'dev -> release' and also free
other kobject resources.
If we will call kfree() here, Then It'll be a redundant call.

~arvind

sln

          return NULL;
      }
      if (vdev->dp)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux