On Wed 11-04-18 10:41:23, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> On 11/04/2018 10:33, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 11-04-18 10:03:36, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> >> @@ -881,7 +876,8 @@ struct page *_vm_normal_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> >>
> >> if (is_zero_pfn(pfn))
> >> return NULL;
> >> -check_pfn:
> >> +
> >> +check_pfn: __maybe_unused
> >> if (unlikely(pfn > highest_memmap_pfn)) {
> >> print_bad_pte(vma, addr, pte, NULL);
> >> return NULL;
> >> @@ -891,7 +887,7 @@ struct page *_vm_normal_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> >> * NOTE! We still have PageReserved() pages in the page tables.
> >> * eg. VDSO mappings can cause them to exist.
> >> */
> >> -out:
> >> +out: __maybe_unused
> >> return pfn_to_page(pfn);
> >
> > Why do we need this ugliness all of the sudden?
> Indeed the compiler doesn't complaint but in theory it should since these
> labels are not used depending on CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PTE_SPECIAL.
Well, such a warning would be quite pointless so I would rather not make
the code ugly. The value of unused label is quite questionable to start
with...
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
