From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 17:39:35 -0600 > Both these patches are on my pci/sparc branch and appeared in the > Feb 19 linux-next tree. > > Any testing and feedback (especially on the second patch, which should > change /proc/iomem) would be great. > > They're headed for v4.17 unless I hear about issues. > > It would be useful to hear about what's still broken so I can try to > pull in the other patches. I don't understand why you put the SYSTEM and Video ROM at addresses relative to absolute zero. The result of this is that it might overlap real physical memory. If a VGA card is present, it's ROM will respond to those addresses relative to the PCI controller's MEM space area. Their legacy resources are "hardwired", but those hardwired addresses need to be relative to the PCI host controller's MEM areas in order for them to be accessible. I could understand removing the System ROM resource altogether, that makes a lot of sense to me. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
