Hi Waldemar! On 06/04/2017 04:40 PM, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: >> So, in your point of view it's perfectly fine if an application is able >> to crash the whole kernel with just user privileges? >> >> Shouldn't the kernel be able to cope with that? > > I think he means your kernel you are running might be miscompiled > with gcc 7.1. The kernel wasn't compiled by 7.1. It was built with 6.3: [ 0.000000] PROMLIB: Sun IEEE Boot Prom 'OBP 4.38.8 2017/02/22 13:51' [ 0.000000] PROMLIB: Root node compatible: sun4v [ 0.000000] Linux version 4.12.0-rc1-sparc64-smp (debian-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) (gcc version 6.3.0 20170510 (Debian 6.3.0-17) ) #1 SMP Debian 4.12~rc1-1~exp1~sparc64 (2017-05-17) > What kernel version you are running? This has been haunting us since around kernel 4.6 or so. It also only shows when building with many parallel jobs. > Which compiler you used to generate the running kernel? 6.3.0 20170510 from the gcc-6 branch. > If it is gcc 7.1, what is if you try to > reproduce the crash with the same kernel version compiled with gcc > 6.3? It's simply gcc-7's testsuite that's crashing the kernel since kernel versions around 4.6. We haven't done any kernel compiles with gcc-7.1 yet since gcc-7.1 not yet the default compiler, we're just building the package in Debian experimental. > Wouldn't this show if it is a compiler or kernel bug? Yes and I think the data suggests it's rather a kernel bug than a bug in gcc. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxx `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html