On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 11:34:10AM -0500, Pasha Tatashin wrote: > Hi Andi, > > Thank you for your comment, I am thinking to limit the default > maximum hash tables sizes to 512M. > > If it is bigger than 512M, we would still need my patch to improve Even 512MB seems too large. I wouldn't go larger than a few tens of MB, maybe 32MB. Also you would need to cover all the big hashes. The most critical ones are likely the network hash tables, these maybe be a bit larger (but certainly also not 0.5TB) -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
