On (02/07/17 14:12), Shannon Nelson wrote:
> +
> + /* we don't expect any other bits */
> + BUG_ON(port->rx_event & ~(LDC_EVENT_DATA_READY |
> + LDC_EVENT_RESET |
> + LDC_EVENT_UP));
> +
> + /* RESET takes precedent over any other event */
> + if (port->rx_event & LDC_EVENT_RESET) {
:
> port->rx_event = 0;
> return 0;
> }
> + if (port->rx_event & LDC_EVENT_UP) {
> + vio_link_state_change(vio, LDC_EVENT_UP);
> + port->rx_event = 0;
> + return 0;
> + }
>
> err = 0;
> tx_wakeup = 0;
IIRC there were timing-related situations where you can get woken up with
both UP and DATA_READY, and if my reading of your patch is
correct, we would ignore the DATA_READY, and return, right?
--Sowmini
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
