Re: NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On 25 Oct 2016, at 18:04, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> From: James Clarke <jrtc27@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:59:04 +0100
> 
>> That’s basically the same as my patch, except this potentially flushes things
>> outside [start, end) if they’re not on 2^22-byte boundaries.
> 
> Oh yes, I see, thanks for pointing that out.
> 
> We have to take the index into account for the purposes of virtual
> address comparison.

I don’t quite follow what you’re trying to say here? idx is only used to index the TSB.

James

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux