On 10/08/2016 05:50 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: tndave <tushar.n.dave@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016
15:49:32 -0700
I have patches ready that resolve the warning/errors reported by
kbuild test robot. I will be sending v2 RFC for ATU series.
I largely have no problem with this patch series, and in particular
we were already on borrowed time wrt. making dma_addr_t 64-bit on
sparc64.
Yeah. Thanks Dave.
A quick query: Should I include fixes for compiler warnings reported by
kbuild robot into same patch series (i.e. along with ATU) or send it
separately? Because the patches that address compiler warnings are for
network, scsi and sound drivers.
Thanks.
It was a nice memory savings while it lasted :-)
:-)
-Tushar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
