Re: [PATCH 1/2] watchdog: Introduce update_arch_nmi_watchdog

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 03:16:42PM -0700, Babu Moger wrote:
> Currently we do not have a way to enable/disable arch specific
> watchdog handlers if it was implemented by any of the architectures.
> 
> This patch introduces new function update_arch_nmi_watchdog
> which can be used to enable/disable architecture specific NMI
> watchdog handlers. Also exposes watchdog_enabled variable outside
> so that arch specific nmi watchdogs can use it to implement
> enalbe/disable behavour.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/linux/nmi.h |    1 +
>  kernel/watchdog.c   |   16 +++++++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/nmi.h b/include/linux/nmi.h
> index 4630eea..01b4830 100644
> --- a/include/linux/nmi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/nmi.h
> @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ static inline bool trigger_allbutself_cpu_backtrace(void)
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR
>  u64 hw_nmi_get_sample_period(int watchdog_thresh);
> +extern unsigned long watchdog_enabled;

The extern is within an #ifdef, but the definition later is
valid alway.
So extern definition should be outside the #ifdef to match the
actual implementation.

To manipulate / read watchdog_enabled two constants are used: 
NMI_WATCHDOG_ENABLED, SOFT_WATCHDOG_ENABLED

They should be visible too, so uses do not fall into the trap
and uses constants (like in patch 2).

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux