To fix:
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x580): Section mismatch in
reference from the function find_numa_latencies_for_group() to the
function .init.text:find_mlgroup()
The function find_numa_latencies_for_group() references the
function __init find_mlgroup(). This is often because
find_numa_latencies_for_group lacks a __init annotation or the
annotation of find_mlgroup is wrong.
It turns out find_numa_latencies_for_group is only called from:
static int __init numa_parse_mdesc(void)
and hence we can tag find_numa_latencies_for_group with __init.
In doing so we see that find_best_numa_node_for_mlgroup is only
called from within __init and hence can also be marked with __init.
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <nitin.m.gupta@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Chris Hyser <chris.hyser@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c b/arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c
index 904cf7d1a744..ddb71fd4d09a 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c
@@ -1160,7 +1160,7 @@ int __node_distance(int from, int to)
return numa_latency[from][to];
}
-static int find_best_numa_node_for_mlgroup(struct mdesc_mlgroup *grp)
+static int __init find_best_numa_node_for_mlgroup(struct mdesc_mlgroup *grp)
{
int i;
@@ -1173,8 +1173,8 @@ static int find_best_numa_node_for_mlgroup(struct mdesc_mlgroup *grp)
return i;
}
-static void find_numa_latencies_for_group(struct mdesc_handle *md, u64 grp,
- int index)
+static void __init find_numa_latencies_for_group(struct mdesc_handle *md,
+ u64 grp, int index)
{
u64 arc;
--
2.8.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
