From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 08:20:15 -0400 (EDT) > On Mon, 1 Aug 2016, David Miller wrote: > >> From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 19:50:57 -0400 (EDT) >> >> > @@ -18,9 +25,9 @@ >> > * of the cases, just fix things up simply here. >> > */ >> > >> > -static unsigned long compute_size(unsigned long start, unsigned long size, unsigned long *offset) >> > +static unsigned long compute_size(unsigned long start, unsigned long size, unsigned long *offset, unsigned long prefetch) >> > { >> > - unsigned long fault_addr = current_thread_info()->fault_address; >> > + unsigned long fault_addr = current_thread_info()->fault_address - prefetch; >> > unsigned long end = start + size; >> > >> > if (fault_addr < start || fault_addr >= end) { >> > @@ -36,7 +43,7 @@ unsigned long copy_from_user_fixup(void >> > { >> > unsigned long offset; >> > >> > - size = compute_size((unsigned long) from, size, &offset); >> > + size = compute_size((unsigned long) from, size, &offset, COPY_FROM_USER_PREFETCH); >> > if (likely(size)) >> > memset(to + offset, 0, size); >> > >> >> I think this might cause a problem. Assume we are not in one of those >> prefetching loops and are just doing a byte at a time, and therefore >> hit the fault exactly at the beginning of the missing page. >> >> You will rewind 0x100 bytes and the caller will restart the copy at >> "faulting address - 0x100". >> >> If someone is using atomic user copies, and using the returned length >> to determine which page in userspace needs to be faulted in, and >> then restart the copy, then we will loop forever. > > This isn't guaranteed on x86 neither. > > __copy_user_intel reads and writes 64 bytes in one loop iteration (and it > prefetches the data for the next iteration with "movl 64(%4), %%eax". If > it fails, it reports the amount of remaining data at the start of the loop > iteration. The reported value may be 67 bytes lower than the fault > location. That's very interesting, let me do some research into this, as I was pretty sure something like futexes or similar had some requirement in this area. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html