On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In general, there's no need for the "restore sigmask" flag to live in
> ti->flags. alpha, ia64, microblaze, powerpc, sh, sparc (64-bit only),
> tile, and x86 use essentially identical alternative implementations,
> placing the flag in ti->status.
>
> Replace those optimized implementations with an equally good common
> implementation that stores it in a bitfield in struct task_struct
> and drop the custom implementations.
>
> Additional architectures can opt in by removing their
> TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK defines.
There is a small typo in the subject, should be "signal: Consolidate
{TS,TIF}_RESTORE_SIGMASK code"
--
Brian Gerst
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
