From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:19:41 +0200 > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 08:49:30PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: >> >From ae7ae09c77621331f8aa18f2281f74640fcc39f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 20:39:11 +0200 >> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] sparc32: fix trap number in call to kgdb_handle_exception >> >> While browsing this code for other reasons this disprecancy >> was noticed. It looks like the code originates from sparc64. >> >> The trap number is in the generic code only used as argument >> to a few methods that for sparc is simple stub functions. >> So the trap number is not used, thus this patch does not >> have any functional impact. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> >> I was tempted to modify kgdb_trap to take the trap number >> as argument, like we do for sparc64. >> But in first try I did the minimal fix. >> >> If you prefer I will redo the patch so we pass the >> trap number in %o1 and pt_regs in %o2 like >> we do on sparc64. > Scrap this patch. > > I ended up doing as I suggested above. Needs to sort out a toolchain issue > so I at least have done a test build before I submit it. Ok. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
