On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 02:49:43PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 13-04-16 12:27:31, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > I'm testing your patches today, if they are otherwise OK [...] > > > > got this build failure: > > > > ./arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h:106:2: error: ‘asm’ operand has impossible constraints > > Hmm, I have no idea why 64b didn't have problem with the asm but 32b > complains. Anyway, the following makes both happy. I have checked the > generated code for 64b and it hasn't changed after the patch. 32b also > seems to be generating a proper code. My gcc asm()-foo is rather weak so > I would feel better if somebody double checked after me. I completely blow at this gcc-asm constraints thing too :/ In any case, Ingo will you look after the rest of these patches, or do you want me to pick up the remaining bits? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
