Re: Invalid sk_policy[] access

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: mroos@xxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 22:51:01 +0200 (EET)

>> > Indeed, the kernel is 64-bit in both cases.
>> > And the userland bit-arity has no relevance whatsoever for this bug.
>> 
>> hang on; The sizeof (and offsetof) values I listed were obtained either
>> from /usr/bin/crash (on the T5) or from simple printk's of the structures
>> in the case of the v440. And they *are* different, and the numbers
> 
> Since there are no config-dependent difference in the struct, maybe it's 
> a compiler version difference for padding/optimization instead?

Changing the layout of a structure would break ABI, so unlikely.

I've never used crash, so I have no idea where it gets it's
information from nor how it interprets it.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux