On 29.10.2015 [18:49:55 -0700], David Miller wrote: > From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 08:57:01 -0700 > > > So, would that imply changing just the NVMe driver code rather than > > adding the dma_page_shift API at all? What about > > architectures that can support the larger page sizes? There is an > > implied performance impact, at least, of shifting the IO size down. > > > > Sorry for the continuing questions -- I got lots of conflicting feedback > > on the last series and want to make sure v4 is more acceptable. > > In the long term I would be very happy to see us having a real interface > for this stuff, just my opinion... Yep, I think I'll try and balance the two -- fix NVMe for now with a 4K page size as suggested by Christoph, and then work on the more complete API for the next merge. Thanks, Nish -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
