On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 03:20:10PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > On 26.10.2015 [18:27:46 -0700], David Miller wrote: > > From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 13:54:20 -0700 > > > > > 1) add a generic dma_get_page_shift implementation that just returns > > > PAGE_SHIFT > > > > I won't object to this patch series, but if I had implemented this I > > would have required the architectures to implement this explicitly, > > one-by-one. I think it is less error prone and more likely to end > > up with all the architectures setting this correctly. > > Well, looks like I should spin up a v4 anyways for the powerpc changes. > So, to make sure I understand your point, should I make the generic > dma_get_page_shift a compile-error kind of thing? It will only fail on > architectures that actually build the NVME driver (as the only caller). > But I'm not sure how exactly to achieve that, if you could give a bit > more detail I'd appreciate it! If you're suggesting to compile-time break architectures that currently work just fine with NVMe, let me stop you right there. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
