Re: 4.1 regression in resizable hashtable tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/02/15 at 10:09pm, Meelis Roos wrote:
> [   33.425061] Running rhashtable test nelem=8, max_size=65536, shrinking=0
> [   33.425154] Test 00:
> [   33.534470]   Adding 50000 keys
> [   34.743553] Info: encountered resize
> [   34.743698] Info: encountered resize
> [   34.743838] Info: encountered resize
> [   34.744057] Info: encountered resize
> [   34.744430] Info: encountered resize
> [   34.745139] Info: encountered resize
> [   34.746441] Info: encountered resize
> [   34.749055] Info: encountered resize
> [   34.754469] Info: encountered resize
> [   34.764836] Info: encountered resize
> [   34.785696] Info: encountered resize
> [   34.827448] Info: encountered resize
> [   34.896936]   Traversal complete: counted=49993, nelems=50000, entries=50000, table-jumps=12
> [   34.897056] Test failed: Total count mismatch ^^^

I do see count mismatches as well due to the design of the walker
which restarts and thus sees certain entries multiple times.

Do you have this commit as well?

Author: Phil Sutter <phil@xxxxxx>
Date:   Mon Jul 6 15:51:20 2015 +0200

    rhashtable: fix for resize events during table walk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux