On (04/18/15 11:28), Guenter Roeck wrote: > > Some merge gone wrong, maybe ? I tried to revert f1600e549b94 > and apply http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/459803/ instead. That patch is a part-2 of a 3-part patch set. In order, this should have been v10: applied as: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/459804/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/459803/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/459802/ The mail thread for the 3-part patch set was here http://www.spinics.net/lists/sparclinux/msg13785.html I noticed that the existing dates on the iommu commits were also odd: commit 671d773297969bebb1732e1cdc1ec03aa53c6be2 Author: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu Mar 12 20:02:37 2015 -0400 commit f1600e549b948a32ad7672e069b2915314637ae3 Author: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu Mar 12 20:02:36 2015 -0400 commit 10b88a4b17d31a7409494b179dcb76e7ab2fcaea Author: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu Mar 12 20:02:35 2015 -0400 We have had many discussions of this patch set since March 12, and the correct version should have been v10, dated something after Apr 9, and acked by Benjamin Herrenschmidt. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
