On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 14:06 -0400, Sowmini Varadhan wrote: > Having bravely said that.. > > the IB team informs me that they see a 10% degradation using > the spin_lock as opposed to the trylock. > > one path going forward is to continue processing this patch-set > as is. I can investigate this further, and later revise the spin_lock > to the trylock, after we are certain that it is good/necessary. Have they tried using more pools instead ? Cheers, Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
