On Thursday 19 March 2015, David Miller wrote: > PowerPC folks, we're trying to kill the locking contention in our > IOMMU allocators and noticed that you guys have a nice solution to > this in your IOMMU code. > > Sowmini put together a patch series that tries to extract out the > generic parts of your code and place it in lib/iommu-common.c so > that both Sparc and PowerPC can make use of it. > > The real test is if powerpc can be converted to use it. > > So if you guys could please take a look at the current version of > this series at: > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/449712/ > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/449713/ > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/449715/ > > and give us some feedback that would be great. > > After we sort out making this work properly for both architectures we > can figure out who merges which parts via what tree(s) How does this relate to the ARM implementation? There is currently an effort going on to make that one shared with ARM64 and possibly x86. Has anyone looked at both the PowerPC and ARM ways of doing the allocation to see if we could pick one of the two to work on all architectures? Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
