On 3/19/15 12:29 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: David Ahern <david.ahern@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 08:15:17 -0600
I realize M7 patches are on hold by you. This one (and the first one
in this set) has nothing to do with the M7. perf counting mode has
been broken for years on sparc; this patch fixes it.
Not on hold, I'm simply waiting for them to be resubmitted.
Anything not marked "under review" in patchwork needs to be explicitly
resubmitting anew if you want me to consider it.
Sorry if that wasn't clear.
Help me understand your process for patches ... I sent the patches to
you and the mailing list. You responded only to the M7 patch (2 of 3).
Should I take that to mean the entire set is invalidated? ie., how do I
know if a patch is marked 'under review'?
If patches are not directly related to one another you want them as
individual patches -- versus what I did here which is 3 individual
patches that touch sparc/perf code.
Most of my patches have gone through acme and he gladly takes individual
patches from a set.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
