From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 15:44:54 -0500 > On (12/19/14 15:24), David Miller wrote: >> > >> > sounds good, I'll do this and get back over the next week. >> > (Some things like the demap function pointer may need to be >> > generalized a bit, e.g., pass the iommu_pool * to the callback for >> > other archs) >> >> It might be cleaner to have a "const struct iommu_ops *" kind of thing >> in the base iommu structure. > > Agreed. The powerpc iommu_table also has a large_pool that I did > not look too carefully into - used for allocating npages > 15 , iirc. > I dont know how commonly that happens. That large_pool mechanism might help prevent the other pools from getting fragmented and thus lead to premature allocation failures. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
