From: mroos@xxxxxxxx Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 00:23:20 +0200 (EET) >> > > > Yes, that does look like the case. Do you have a good trick on how >> > > > to allocate a map for the highest possible cpu number without first >> > > > iterating the cpu map? I couldn't find something that looks like a >> > > > highest_possible_cpu() helper. >> > > >> > > Honestly I think that num_posible_cpus() should return the max of >> > > number of CPUs (weigt), and the highest numbered CPU. It's a pain in >> > > the butt to handle this otherwise. >> > >> > Hear, hear!!! That would make my life easier, and would make this sort >> > of problem much less likely to occur! >> >> How about this one? > > It make the machine work. Thanks for testing! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html