On (10/21/14 18:56), Dave Kleikamp wrote: > > > > Is gcc not smart enough to know that this variable isn't used before > > it's set? (I assume it isn't used elsewhere in this function) > > It probably assumes in_softirq() might evaluate differently in the each > case. yes, that's what I suspected too. I suppose it is possible from the compiler's point of view that something in between might change the result of in_softirq() so that we may be using an uninit variable in the second call. anyway, the warning was annoying, and would only numb the user into ignoring other real issues, so I figured I might as well silence the warning. --Sowmini -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
