Re: unaligned accesses in SLAB etc.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 22:15:10 -0400 (EDT)

> 
> I'm getting tons of the following on sparc64:
> 
> [603965.383447] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[546b58] free_block+0x98/0x1a0
> [603965.396987] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[546b60] free_block+0xa0/0x1a0
> [603965.410523] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[546b58] free_block+0x98/0x1a0

The unaligned accesses are happening in the SLAB_OBJ_PFMEMALLOC code,
which assumes that all object pointers are "unsigned long" aligned:

static inline void set_obj_pfmemalloc(void **objp)
{
        *objp = (void *)((unsigned long)*objp | SLAB_OBJ_PFMEMALLOC);
        return;
}

etc. etc.

But that code has been there working forever.  Something changed
recently such that this assumption no longer holds.

In all of the cases, the address is 4-byte aligned but not 8-byte
aligned.  And they are vmalloc addresses.

Which made me suspect the percpu commit:

====================
commit bf0dea23a9c094ae869a88bb694fbe966671bf6d
Author: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx>
Date:   Thu Oct 9 15:26:27 2014 -0700

    mm/slab: use percpu allocator for cpu cache
====================

And indeed, reverting this commit fixes the problem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux