Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] sparc64: MM/IRQ patch queue.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Miller wrote:	[Mon Sep 29 2014, 09:56:10PM EDT]
> From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 21:52:54 -0400 (EDT)
> 
> > From: Bob Picco <bpicco@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 18:35:22 -0400
> > 
> >> PERCPU: max_distance=0x380001c10000 too large for vmalloc space 0xff00000000
> >> . So just subtract 0xffff800000000000UL from "ptr".
> > 
> > Bob you're not running my current patches.
> > 
> > The vmalloc space is enlarged by the current patch set and should
> > no longer run into this issue, and it's specifically what I was
> > interested in seeing work or not.
> 
> Ignore me, I see you were just trying to explain how memory is layed
> out on this T5 machines and why (which I understood already :-)
Ah no problem, I feared being called away and the potential remains today.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux