On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:14:24AM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
> Use MSI chip framework instead of arch MSI functions to configure
> MSI/MSI-X irq. So we can manage MSI/MSI-X irq in a unified framework.
Nit: s/irq/IRQ/ in the above.
> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/mips/pci/msi-xlp.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/pci/msi-xlp.c b/arch/mips/pci/msi-xlp.c
> index e469dc7..6b791ef 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/pci/msi-xlp.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/pci/msi-xlp.c
> @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static struct irq_chip xlp_msix_chip = {
> .irq_unmask = unmask_msi_irq,
> };
>
> -void arch_teardown_msi_irq(unsigned int irq)
> +void xlp_teardown_msi_irq(unsigned int irq)
Should this not be static now as well?
Thierry
Attachment:
pgp2QAdCSvnBK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
