David Miller wrote: [Thu Sep 18 2014, 01:13:22PM EDT] > From: Bob Picco <bpicco@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 06:16:06 -0400 > > > The machine has more reg property entries than this kernel can > > support (32). > > Bob, is there some upper bound we can use? I'm happy to enlarge it > to whatever reasonable size is necessary. I just sent an email because my knowledge isn't LDOM guest. > > The 'memory' node properties are the one thing I don't think we can > reasonably dynamically allocate memory for, so they have to be > statically sized. I agree. > > With the changes we are discussing here, we are getting several > megabytes of BSS space back in the kernel image, so there is lots > of room for expanding the value of MAX_BANKS :-) Indeed. > > Also, that debugging message from read_obp_memory() should also > print out "ents" so we know how much we might need to expand it > in the future. Yes. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
