Re: [PATCH] sparc64: find_node adjustment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Miller wrote:	[Tue Sep 09 2014, 06:20:01PM EDT]
> From: Bob Picco <bpicco@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sun,  7 Sep 2014 11:51:06 -0400
> 
> > Hopefully this isn't too confusing. I'll add the reference below for those
> > with a need for further details:
> > http://psarc.us.oracle.com/FWARC/2007/260/materials/lgroups_onepager.txt
> 
> "This webpage is not available", I think you can only get at this
> from inside Oracle, and if so it's inappropriate to use it as a
> reference in a commit message.
This is unfortunate for many old SMI sites.
> 
> Anyways, as per the bug, it looks simply like node matching
> information is missing sometimes.
Okay.
> 
> Whilst unfortunate, you're right that we should code defensively and
> not fail if that happens, especially if we know that it can.
Okay.
> 
> Please respin this with the commit message adjusted, thanks.
Will respin and drop the reference and you're welcome.

thanx for the review,

bob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux