Am 04.08.2014 22:47, schrieb Andrey Utkin: > This commit is a guesswork, but it seems to make sense to drop this > break, as otherwise the following line is never executed and becomes > dead code. And that following line actually saves the result of > local calculation by the pointer given in function argument. So the > proposed change makes sense if this code in the whole makes sense (but I > am unable to analyze it in the whole). > > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81641 > Reported-by: David Binderman <dcb314@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Andrey Utkin <andrey.krieger.utkin@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/sparc/math-emu/math_32.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/sparc/math-emu/math_32.c b/arch/sparc/math-emu/math_32.c > index aa4d55b..5ce8f2f 100644 > --- a/arch/sparc/math-emu/math_32.c > +++ b/arch/sparc/math-emu/math_32.c > @@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ static int do_one_mathemu(u32 insn, unsigned long *pfsr, unsigned long *fregs) > case 0: fsr = *pfsr; > if (IR == -1) IR = 2; > /* fcc is always fcc0 */ The patch looks ok, but can somebody comment on this comment ? what "fcc" ? should it be a fsr ? > - fsr &= ~0xc00; fsr |= (IR << 10); break; > + fsr &= ~0xc00; fsr |= (IR << 10); nitpicking: fsr &= ~0xc00; fsr |= (IR << 10); It is better readable. re, wh > *pfsr = fsr; > break; > case 1: rd->s = IR; break; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
