On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 11:41:50PM -0400, David Miller wrote: > From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 18:55:33 +0200 > > > On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 10:06:49PM -0400, David Miller wrote: > >> > >> Ok I reviewed all of this, it all looks good. > >> > >> Thanks a lot for doing this, all applied to sparc-next. > > Good. And I am glad you spotted the bug in the first > > version so we did not have that applied. > > > > If you find time and have any hints how to fix > > the remaining sparse warnings in arch/sparc/ > > please let me know. > > Sorry Sam I've lost context. > > Is there a specific list you posted or should I run an sparse build > of my own and check it out? I posted a list of remaining sparse issues in the original cover mail. But I think we should let them wait and maybe address then in next round. arch/sparc already have lots of stuff pending for next merge window. On top of this I have a few other things that has higher priority. I will re-post a list of open issues when I plan to look at them again. Sam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
