On 01/31/2014 02:50 PM, Andreas Larsson wrote: > On 2014-01-31 14:40, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >> On 01/31/2014 02:34 PM, Florian Vaussard wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> (could someone with a SJA1000 on SPARC perform a functional test >>> to see if interrupts are working? it would be great :-) >>> >>> Changes since v2: >>> - Dropped patch 1 "can: sja1000: remove unused defines" >>> - Addressed Marc's comments on patch 4 and 6 (now 3 and 5) >>> >>> Changes since v1: >>> - Merge sja1000_of_platform.c into sja1000_platform.c (patch 4) >>> >>> The first part of this series performs serveral small cleanups >>> (patches 1 and 2). >>> >>> Patch 3 merges sja1000_of_platform.c into sja1000_platform.c. >>> Changes are pretty conservatives (mostly copy/paste/move). IRQ >>> is treated differently in the OF and non-OF versions, thus this >>> is where the fused version differs the most. >>> >>> The final part introduces the 'reg-io-width' binding (already used >>> by some other drivers) to perform a similar job as what was done >>> with IORESOURCE_MEM_XXBIT. This is needed on my system to correctly >>> take into account the aliasing of the address bus. >>> >>> All patches were tested using OF boot on my OMAP3 system with a >>> memory-mapped SJA1000. Thus, the non-OF path is not tested, as >>> I do not have a platform data at hand. >> >> Nice, looks good now. I'll give Andreas some time to test on sparc and >> then apply the patches. > > > I am on it. I will dig up some hardware for this on Monday to test it. > Many thanks :o) (be careful to enable CAN_SJA1000_PLATFORM, as I removed CAN_SJA1000_PLATFORM_OF) Regards, Florian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
