Hi Viresh, On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > I have been doing some CPUFreq cleanup work and > wanted to know if the below mentioned machines have separate > clock domains for their CPUs or all share the same domain? > > So, that we can use some generic routines for these drivers which > would eventually do: > > cpumask_setall(policy->cpus); > > And I wanted to make sure that this doesn't break them.. :) > > ...... > > The drivers are: ... > drivers/cpufreq/sh-cpufreq.c ... The above SH cpufreq driver seems to be written with SMP in mind, but I would say SMP is a very rare case for SH. So I believe it can be considered as UP-only at this point. If Paul disagrees I'm quite sure he will tell us. Cheers, / magnus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
