As Peter Z. explained at: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/12/12/268 it's not needed at all and I even tested it back then. This patch just got lost in the shuffle for some reason. Reported-by: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/sparc/include/asm/processor_64.h | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/processor_64.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/processor_64.h index cce72ce..4c3f7f0 100644 --- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/processor_64.h +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/processor_64.h @@ -18,9 +18,6 @@ #include <asm/ptrace.h> #include <asm/page.h> -/* Don't hold the runqueue lock over context switch */ -#define __ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW - /* The sparc has no problems with write protection */ #define wp_works_ok 1 #define wp_works_ok__is_a_macro /* for versions in ksyms.c */ -- 1.7.11.7 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
