[PATCH 1/3] sparc64: Fix gfp_flags setting in tsb_grow().

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



We should "|= more_flags" rather than "= more_flags".

Reported-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/sparc/mm/tsb.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/sparc/mm/tsb.c b/arch/sparc/mm/tsb.c
index 7f64743..428982b 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/mm/tsb.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/mm/tsb.c
@@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ void tsb_grow(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long tsb_index, unsigned long rss)
 retry_tsb_alloc:
 	gfp_flags = GFP_KERNEL;
 	if (new_size > (PAGE_SIZE * 2))
-		gfp_flags = __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NORETRY;
+		gfp_flags |= __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NORETRY;
 
 	new_tsb = kmem_cache_alloc_node(tsb_caches[new_cache_index],
 					gfp_flags, numa_node_id());
-- 
1.8.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux