From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 10:53:15 +0100 > Are you aware of any reasons why this conflict would still be necessary? No reason that I can see, I'll push something like the patch below via the sparc tree. > This is not only the case for OF_GPIO but likely also for OF_SPI, > OF_I2C, OF_IRQ and OF_ADDRESS. Shouldn't those all work even on SPARC > nowadays? Those also would need to be tested on an individual basis, but there are no fundamental problems that I am aware of. diff --git a/arch/sparc/Kconfig b/arch/sparc/Kconfig index b6b442b..f0a5391 100644 --- a/arch/sparc/Kconfig +++ b/arch/sparc/Kconfig @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ config SPARC default y select OF select OF_PROMTREE + select OF_GPIO select HAVE_IDE select HAVE_OPROFILE select HAVE_ARCH_KGDB if !SMP || SPARC64 diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig index d055cee..f11d8e3 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ if GPIOLIB config OF_GPIO def_bool y - depends on OF && !SPARC + depends on OF config DEBUG_GPIO bool "Debug GPIO calls" -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
